The Nationals LNP

Photo Gallery
Community Switch
This week's rainfall
Barnaby's Blog
 

Media Releases

15

 

The release by the Productivity Commission of their recommendation to remove protections for the Australian domestic publishing market and authors, because they say this will benefit consumers, needs far greater examination.
I’ve heard this argument before and it is generally pursued by the vested interests who in the long term seek to exploit the market by bringing about market centralisation under their control.
This may be just another example where the rhetoric of vested interest parts company with the facts that follow.
Deregulation of the wheat desk was supposed to be of great benefit to farmers. The reality is it was a disaster and farmers are now being paid hundreds of dollars per tonne less than they were before deregulation.
The repeal of the sites and franchise act limiting major oil companies to five percent of sites was supposed to be of great benefit to consumers; however I doubt that anyone thinks, in hindsight, this was a great move. It forced independents out of the market and gave greater powers to those in the market who already had too much.
The centralisation of retail has brought our nation the highest food inflation in the western world yet the price at the farm gate has remained static or in some instances has gone down.  It is these same retailers who want changes to the domestic publishing market.
 We now have the major retailers being the biggest sellers of fuel, food, cigarettes, alcohol and benefactors of gaming machine revenue. They control our stomachs, rule our vices and now they are very interested in what we read as we continue live in the contented glow of their so called benevolence.
There is strong question about the authenticity of the Australian culture being protected and one can only take the recommendations from those who count, the authors, who strongly believe the outcome of this legislative change will be detrimental to the continuing capacity of Australia to define itself by its own literary palette. These are the questions that should be properly ventilated by a Senate inquiry and certainly prior to the passage of any legislation.
I have to be honest in my time in politics I’ve seen some set ups and this is starting to stink of one.
Media Inquiries
David Allender
07 4625 1500
02 6277 3244
0428 196 340
Actions: E-mail | Permalink

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Enter the code shown above:

Comments

Sunday, July 19, 2009 5:23 PM
Dear Barnaby Joyce

A thousand thanks for your generous support of Australian writers in their horrifying battle with the Productivity Commission. As a picture book writer I share my royalties with an illustrator. We receive 5% of the rrp for each book which is, for example, about 64 cents on each Australian paperback of my book Possum Magic. If the Commission's suggestions go ahead our royalty will be calculated at around 29 cents on a cheaper book imported from overseas and sanitized of all its Australian-ness, So writers will have their income halved and Australia will lose its unique culture in one swift move so that Dymocks can make even more money than they do already: they earn from each book four times as much as I do. So you voice is a welcome one.

Hugs and thanks!

Mem Fox AM
# Al
Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:53 AM
"I’ve heard this argument before and it is generally pursued by the vested interests who in the long term seek to exploit the market by bringing about market centralisation under their control."

Thank you, Barnaby Joyce. That is precisely what it is about -- big business dictating Australia's future. Is that really what Australians want?
# Vicki
Thursday, July 23, 2009 8:41 AM
Mr Joyce, you've nailed it. Who's behind the call to lift the restrictions – at the expense of Australia's literary industry – on the parallel importation of books? Only the same corporations that already control the bulk of what we buy.

The average author, according to the Australian Society of Authors, earns $11,000 a year and Dymocks’ CEO, Don Grover, has the audacity to call THEM greedy?
# TL
Thursday, July 23, 2009 9:53 PM
Dear Senator Joyce,
Thank you for standing up for the rights of Australians - even those who don't yet realise that their rights are being undermined.

This isn't just about authors, as Bob Carr & friends seem to imply, it's about knowing what's right for Australia.

The ACCC findings on Woolies & Coles discounting fuel by 40c (that there was nothing wrong with that), is just indicative of how we have lost our way. Former ACCC head, Mr Fels, is quoted recently as saying the protections to the Australian publishing industry (which are the same as in the UK & US) must come down, for the sake of competition! Could someone please explain that the ACCC is charged with bettering the interests of consumers, not big business!

It's infuriating that the ACCC has taken an esoteric, rather than real-world view of competition. It's about maintaining the delicate balance that is required for fair competition in Australia. It's not about opening Australia up to be picked apart by overseas interests which can pull up stumps at a moment's notice. Surely, Australian industries, supporting Australian jobs, deserve better than this.
# Ted
Friday, July 24, 2009 1:04 AM
Dear Barnaby,
Please expose the Fabian Socialists for what they are.

Home | Issues | Blog | Newsroom | Achievements | Policies | About Barnaby | Out and About | Links | Feedback
Accessibility | Privacy Policy & Disclaimer | Site by Datasearch Web Design | Login

© Senator Barnaby Joyce 2011 | Authorised by Barnaby Joyce - 68 The Terrace, St. George Qld 4487