The Nationals LNP

Photo Gallery
Community Switch
This week's rainfall
Barnaby's Blog
 

Media Releases

09

 

Prior to the passage of the carbon tax, the amount of renewable (or as the government likes to describe it 'clean') energy that would be generated by our nation by 2020 was 50 terawatt hours, according to a report for the government by SKM MMA.  

 

Yesterday, the Senate passed over 1000 pages worth of law, titled the Clean Energy bills. On the passage of these clean energy bills, the amount of clean energy generated in Australia by 2020 will be 50 terawatt hours.

 

That's right it is exactly the same amount. The clean energy bills will encourage exactly zero additional supply of electricity generation from clean energy sources.

 

So, now not only do you have the pleasure of being poorer, noting that it will have exactly zero affect on the climate, you will also have the pleasure of the clean energy bills producing absolutely no additional clean energy by 2020.

 

I suppose we shouldn't be surprised that a clean energy bill doesn't actually produce any new clean energy. It's like all the democracy that existed in the Democratic Republic of Germany prior to the fall of the Berlin wall, or exists now in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea.

 

As the consultants SKM MMA put it to the government in their report:

 

The level of renewable generation by 2020 is significantly higher only for the high price scenario, which suggests that in the absence of the LRET the carbon prices for the low price and core policy cases at that point ($13/t CO2e and $29.5/t CO2Figure 7e respectively) are not high enough to support widespread new entrant renewable generation.

 

Actions: E-mail | Permalink

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Enter the code shown above:

Comments

Thursday, November 10, 2011 7:35 AM
It appears from a brief read of the report in question, that there is an additional 14TWh in energy efficiency in the 10 year period in question between the Medium Case (reference case) and the Core Policy case (closest to the legislation passed). This is due to the fact that energy efficiency is the cheapest form of abatement available. If you include that as a form of energy generation: which it is as it is "replacing" supply with a zero level of emissions, then the numbers change significantly.
Friday, November 11, 2011 6:10 PM
Liz,

You are basically correct but what does that have to do with the tax. Encouraging people to save money (energy) can be done at any time and does not need to be by making them poorer first. If there is a change that just suggests the government has lack of leadership and skill in informing people how to save money.
# barry
Sunday, November 13, 2011 3:38 PM
I think the opposition should force the government to have a fresh election so every Australian citizen will have a say about the carbon tax,no amount of reports will change the fact that we were deceived by the Gillard government .and if the polls are correct then 65 percent of the population will have their say through a fresh election and whoever wins then good luck

Home | Issues | Blog | Newsroom | Achievements | Policies | About Barnaby | Out and About | Links | Feedback
Accessibility | Privacy Policy & Disclaimer | Site by Datasearch Web Design | Login

© Senator Barnaby Joyce 2011 | Authorised by Barnaby Joyce - 68 The Terrace, St. George Qld 4487