The conjecture surrounding Section 282 of the QLD Criminal Code has come up for debate in the Queensland State Parliament. This issue demands prominent attention as it is one of the seminal, political and philosophical issues of our time. Even though the opposing sides may disagree strongly on their point of view, both would agree that this issue is one of the most emotional.
The right of one individual to own, and if required to terminate the life of another, is an issue that is not differentiated on by political parties, or by race, or by religion. Everybody knows somebody with strong views on either side of the abortion debate.
The key question that has to be answered is when does the right to nurture and protect include the right to terminate. At what point in time does this happen? It is overwhelmingly acknowledged that taking someone’s life as they stand in the street is morally wrong and beyond discussion. The person standing in the street is not an imminent or comparable threat to our own life. To do it to a child even though they may not be cognisant of their rights is reprehensible, deplorable and gathers the greatest opprobrium of any action when it is perpetrated.
So when does that action dissipate to one where not only is the destruction sanctioned but is paid for by the State. This is a debate that stirs emotions and can lose you friends but it should not be avoided, especially in the political sphere which is the mechanism for such a discussion to occur.
This is not a judgement about the past or things that may have occurred in the past. It is a debate about what we know now, what we feel and what we should do in the future. It demands the capacity to accept the past and the acknowledgment that we should change the future.
Media Inquires
David Allender
07 4625 1500
0428 196 340