Senator Joyce today moved a motion on the Water Act 2007 to dispel the confusion held in the Murray Darling Basin on whether it can deliver a true triple-bottom line approach on economic, social and environmental factors.
Senator Joyce moved an amendment to add this paragraph to the terms of reference to a Senate inquiry into the implementation of the Basin Plan:
(j) investigate any ambiguity in the Water Act 2007 which may prevent the delivery of a triple bottom line of economic, social and environmental outcomes
Senator Joyce’s amendment initially passed the Senate because a member of the Labor -Greens alliance failed to attend the division. But, revealing the determination of the Labor-Green Alliance to hide from this issue, the Labor Party insisted on a recommitting of the vote. So the opportunity for the Parliament to provide some certainty to the concerned towns of the Basin was lost, the vote ended in a tie. (Tied votes being seen as lost votes.)
If this is not corrected the uncertainties will remain that the approach in the current Guide to the Basin Plan will not be removed when the final draft is presented to the Minister.
Senator Joyce said, “I think it is vitally important that we show the Australian people that in this Parliament we are trying to hide nothing. The coalition is not hiding behind anything in trying to make sure we bring a triple bottom line result.
“I gave a commitment at Mildura to farmers that I would specifically address their belief that there were ambiguities in the Act and I would have these ventilated by a current inquiry. I failed in this desire in this instance not because of any reason except that the Labor-Greens alliance determined that they did not want a specific reference to ambiguities in the interpretation of the Act.
“The Labor Party has now fully signed on to the process that they are happy with the Act in its current form and will not entertain amendments that will meet their rhetorical statements that they want a triple bottom line approach.
“It is only the Coalition that puts its money where its mouth is on this issue.”