The Nationals LNP

Photo Gallery
Community Switch
This week's rainfall
Barnaby's Blog
 

Barnaby's Blog

29

Well, this should allay our fears about the Prime Minister’s sincerity. He’s decided after 10 months of having the plans on hold to put a new tax on, wait for it–smoking. What a stroke of genius.  I suppose it’s a carbon abatement scheme of sorts, but I don’t think this is the one he took to the election. It is, though, a good reflection of the proportional relevance of his policy delivery. He talked about an emissions trading scheme to reduce billions of  tonnes of carbon, but what he gave us was the removal of a few durries, with another moralistic  sermon as a bandaid on his street cred which is more than a little bruised of late.

 While in November last year, Mr Rudd said that any delay on climate change action would be “political cowardice ... an absolute failure of leadership ... and ... an absolute failure of logic", he has now managed to gather the courage to introduce what he called today “an unpopular” move to increase the cost of cigarettes by 25%.
This may be a good move in the interest of health, but it’s not going to cure Mr Rudd’s lack of credibility. It will be called for what it is – ‘a government desperate to do anything to avoid attention because the reality is that they’ve done nothing’ story.
Mr Rudd says this is not a diversion from the ETS, so why wasn’t it announced as part of his health reform package or the budget?  He doesn’t have the conviction to get the “Great Big Tax on Everything” up through a double dissolution, but he can put a tax on the individual emissions from the smokers of Australia. Maybe a tax on cigarettes is a more authentic exposé of the depths of his political complexity and belief.
Actions: E-mail | Permalink

Post Comment

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Enter the code shown above:

Comments

# Lorikeet
Thursday, April 29, 2010 6:21 PM
I have had low paid workers complaining to me about the increase in the price of cigarettes.

They don't understand much about politics in general, but they do know that Rudd is making them pay for all of his bungled "Green Plans".

These are people from the nursing home who are being screwed financially due to Rudd agreeing to bring in foreign workers who won't join unions. I'm sure they were brought in to aid and abet The Macquarie Group in keeping an even larger amount of elderly citizens' government pensions for themselves, and to prevent wages from rising.

Rudd has spat in the faces of a large section of his voter base twice. I'm sure some will spit back at the next election.
# shannon
Monday, May 03, 2010 11:24 AM
I dont support smoking overall but I dont agree with why this section of people are being "slugged" even more money.!
Truth is most "will continue to buy them" no matter what price they are ..at the expense of most probably food items.
This in turn will place more pressure on welfare agencies.
Saying smokers put more pressure on the health sector..isnt entirely true either.
Working in the medical field, I see many injured patients caused by "drunk" drivers ..and they are on the increase..so what about alcohol taxing?
Well doesnt take much "brain power" to work out that it all comes down to Rudd and the number of votes lost.....
Of course drinking is just as bad as smoking....BUT smokers make up a smaller % of voters....so why not TAX the smokers to the eyeballs...
This govt has NO PRINCIPLES...and all policies are vote driven...welfare of people ....Labor doesnt give a hoot....worst govn. ever !!
# Lorikeet
Tuesday, May 04, 2010 4:44 PM
shannon:

All of the men in my father's family died from smoking related illnesses (lung cancer, emphysema, advanced circulatory disease requiring amputation of both legs) except for the one who drank and smoked the most.

There are probably more smokers among lower paid workers, and you're right in thinking that the family food budget might suffer.

A lot of the people who work in aged care get very low pay, thanks to Rudd's Green communist agenda. Some are paying $750+ per fortnight in rent.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 5:41 AM
While in November last year, Mr Rudd said that any delay on climate change action would be “political cowardice ... an absolute failure of leadership ... and ... an absolute failure of logic", he has now managed to gather the courage to introduce what he called today “an unpopular” move to increase the cost of cigarettes by 25%.
# Lorikeet
Tuesday, February 22, 2011 7:56 AM
I have no real problem with Labor wanting to put an end to cigarette smoking, which has huge costs attached to both the community's health and the health budget.

Making nicotine patches more affordable was a move in the right direction. Now I have to wonder if the increased cost of cigarettes will deprive lower paid workers' children of food and clothing, or whether it will improve the health of both the parents and the household budget.

Let's hope it is the latter rather than the former.

The decline of cigarette smoking will take a lot of profits away from large corporations in the supermarket sector and tobacco industry, which can only be a plus.

But we must also consider what they are likely to be trying to sell us as a replacement in the future. Let's hope it isn't going to be Green "tobacco", reefers and custom-made bongs!

Home | Issues | Blog | Newsroom | Achievements | Policies | About Barnaby | Out and About | Links | Feedback
Accessibility | Privacy Policy & Disclaimer | Site by Datasearch Web Design | Login

© Senator Barnaby Joyce 2011 | Authorised by Barnaby Joyce - 68 The Terrace, St. George Qld 4487